The Showdown
WebRTC (Google Implementation)vsicey
Why pay monthly fees for WebRTC (Google Implementation) when you can self-host icey for free? Let's look at the facts.
VS
WebRTC (Google Implementation)
The Expensive Option
- Closed Source (Black box)
- Expensive monthly fees per user
- Data stored on their servers
WINNER
icey
The Freedom Choice
- 100% Open Source Code
- Free forever (Self-hosted)
- You own your data completely
Interactive Calculator
Calculate Your "SaaS Tax"
SaaS pricing is designed to scale with your success.
See how much wealth transfers from your bank account to WebRTC (Google Implementation)'s shareholders.
10 people
150100200+
$
*Estimated standard pricing for WebRTC (Google Implementation). Adjust if needed.
Estimated Annual Waste
$1,440
Monthly Burn Rate$120
5-Year Projection$7,200
Cost with Self-Hosted$0
Calculations based on 10 users at $12/mo.
Detailed Breakdown
0
Heavy multi-megabyte library
Minimalist C++20 footprint
1
Standard protocol overhead
Optimized low-level media path
2
C++ with heavy JS bindings
Native C++20